That data is interesting and your and Hamilton's arguments re organizing workers are right on. I was making the much more limited point that I don't think most D candidates and their advisors will be willing to give up free field work that has even a very small impact on close races. Just another factor limiting Ds' willingness to give up on labor because of declining union density.
That data is interesting and your and Hamilton's arguments re organizing workers are right on. I was making the much more limited point that I don't think most D candidates and their advisors will be willing to give up free field work that has even a very small impact on close races. Just another factor limiting Ds' willingness to give up on labor because of declining union density.
That data is interesting and your and Hamilton's arguments re organizing workers are right on. I was making the much more limited point that I don't think most D candidates and their advisors will be willing to give up free field work that has even a very small impact on close races. Just another factor limiting Ds' willingness to give up on labor because of declining union density.
Yes, that makes sense!!