Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Browner Hamlin's avatar

You said it before I could comment but the only viable answer at scale would be public funding of journalism. $50B is a small number for the federal government (and it’d be even smaller if states and municipalities took responsibility for contributing to journalism at varying scales).

Expand full comment
Kaleberg's avatar

Well into the 20th century, a lot of small town newspapers survived because local government was required to post public notices of auctions, proposed actions, settlements, judgements and what not in a newspaper. It wasn't a ton of money, but it paid enough to keep a minimal local paper in business. The funders were generally states, cities, towns and counties. The US government had its own Superintendent of Documents, and it is possible that some states did their own printing as well.

By the late 20th century, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post had evolved into national papers. You could get daily delivery in many cities and, even now, they provide world and national news to a lot of papers much like the Associated Press. (The AP was an artifact of the telegraph and railroad era.) If anything, their reach risen with the rise of the internet. The internet has been less kind to local news coverage.

There is a precedent for the government funding local news. Local governments now publish their official public notices online, but these are often disjointed and lack context. I know there is the issue of keeping the press independent, especially as the nation is as partisan now as in the early 19th century. Still, there might be some mechanism.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts