48 Comments
User's avatar
Stephanie Kass's avatar

omg this is absolutely epic and made me laugh out loud several times... PERFECT example of #NotTheOnion. What's so crazy is that a lot of convo about Mamdani within leftist circles is focused on the (real) issue of his policies being more mainstream than one would hope. (NYC DSA does not have the best track record in lefty circles.) That being said, PLEASE VOTE FOR ZOHRAN!!!

Love, a NY Jew <3

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar

(:

Expand full comment
Pablo Andreu's avatar

Unhinged, frothing-at-the-mouth coverage. He's not even mayor yet.

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar

That's how askeert they are of him...baby LIKE!

if they thought he was going to 'fail', they'd just sit back, keep their fucking pie-holes shut and LET him fail. No, they're worried that he might succeed..

Expand full comment
Pablo Andreu's avatar

No question. The billionaire’s rag is terrified.

Expand full comment
Jeff Kirk's avatar

The weird part is that they've actually been *more* moderate in their op-eds this year than the Post. (I didn't expect Jeff Bezos to be an even bigger dick than Rupert Murdoch, but here we are.)

Mamdani is the obvious exception, and their McCarthy-esque hysteria is almost sad in its needless desperation, but they've been far more critical of the Trump 2.0 regime than the Post, and nearly as critical as the Times.

But it's almost like Americans over 55 or so have a Pavlovian reaction: socialism = SOVIET-STYLE MARXIST-LENINIST TOTALITARIANISM!!! (And as others have pointed out, people under 40 don't have any lived experience with the Cold War, and are presumably less predisposed against it for that reason.)

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar

warms my cold cold socialist heart!

(:

Expand full comment
Pablo Andreu's avatar

Lol

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar
7hEdited

And like I was saying below, they KNOW that the hate directed at the .001% is 100% justified. THAT'S what scares the shit out of them. Liken if you spent your teenage life beating up on some little kid and one day that kid is bigger and carrying a baseball bat, you KNOW he's not there to play baseball. And you KNOW you have it coming

Expand full comment
Snowbird's avatar

I would expect exactly that from the wsj

Expand full comment
Hope Rehak's avatar

Ridiculous. Most of these words could only be written by people who don’t see that unfettered capitalism leads to the very real problems they imagine for a socialist future.

Expand full comment
Chris Oster's avatar

But they all imagine these problems would only happen to THOSE people, so it's ok.

Expand full comment
b-rar's avatar

Let the wealthy elite flee to their safe spaces then if this, the mildest possible incarnation of social democracy, frightens them so. They can have the rich cultural offerings of Darien CT all to themselves on a full-time basis

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Wow. Talk about hysterics.

And I laughed out loud at the “breadlines” comment. What do they think is happening TODAY, as Trump’s/MAGA’s economic visions are made manifest, with thousands of job losses nationwide, and SNAP benefits ending?

Expand full comment
ObjectivelyDrew's avatar

WSJ should consider a rebrand to "Rich People Lying Poorly"

Expand full comment
Lydia Sugarman's avatar

Opinions are like assholes — everyone has one. In fact, some have more than one! And, they get theirs exposed on the WSJ Opinion page.

Expand full comment
StanleyTwoBrix's avatar

Everyone has one, and they all stink.

Expand full comment
Josh McHugh's avatar

“Well I guess the voters will decide.” 🤌

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar

“Manhattanites are warning that Mr. Mamdani’s ruinous utopianism could prompt a flight of talent and capital"

Capital? theoretically 'yes'...TALENT? Definitively NO

Expand full comment
Gretchen Theodorakis's avatar

He may be too progressive for you but my bottom line is…. FUCKING HEALTH

CARE FOR ALL!

No one else has a way to make that happen so My vote goes for Mamdani.

The Democrats and Republicans have

Fucked up and now will allow hungry Americans to starve.

I’m voting for the candidate who cares about me.

Mamdani is the only choice.

Expand full comment
Gregg Meluski's avatar

That was A LOT.

Expand full comment
Matt McGraw's avatar

The lady doth protest too much. Almost like they’re existence is threatened by his presence.

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar
7hEdited

I think they're finally beginning to realize JUST HOW MUCH they and their kind are JUSTIFIABLY hated...

that's the real kicker...That they KNOW this hatred for the .001% is justified

So anyone claiming the OWS protests didn't 'do' anything, need only look to Mamdani's run and popularity in America's greatest city and rethink that.

Its a process

Expand full comment
Emily Lewis's avatar

THEIR existence.

Expand full comment
belfryo's avatar
5hEdited

You responded to the wrong comment

(:

Expand full comment
KenInMN's avatar

And, like FDR, he welcomes their hatred...

Expand full comment
Emily Lewis's avatar

The end of the world if Mamdani is elected? Hmm.

Anything to make a buck or a trillion bucks.

Expand full comment
Jeff Kirk's avatar

Since I'm a news junkie and apparently a masochist, I still read my longtime news trifecta each day: NYT, WaPo, WSJ. While yes, I'm as appalled as everyone else is by the Post's rightward lurch on Jeff Bezos's orders, that doesn't change the fact that the news – meaning the fact- and reality-based version rarely seen on Fox News - is more necessary than ever.

Op-eds are another story, however, and while I knew the Journal was overreacting to the prospect of a Mamdani mayorship, unlike Hamilton I didn't stop to count all of them. But HOLY SHIT is that a lot! The oddest part is getting used to the Journal having *better* op-eds than the Post for most of Trump 2.0, though Mamdani is obviously an exception. They've been outright savage in their attacks against Trump's tariff insanity in particular.

And while a WSJ meltdown over anything remotely "socialist" is predictable (with extra fuel from anti-Muslim bigotry), the reactions from leading Democrats are another story. Rahm Emanuel – Obama's first chief of staff as president, and a two-term Chicago mayor – wrote one of the slams, and Cuomo's barely even bothered to hide his rank Islamophobia. Even Hakeem Jeffries withheld his endorsement until the last minute.

It's hard to believe how oblivious the Democratic establishment remains – even now – to the surge in Palestinian support among younger, mostly Gen Z progressives disgusted by Israel's handling of Gaza. But instead of actually fixing their own intraparty issues, they've gone on the attack – AND against a younger Muslim, and obvious Palestine supporter, at that.

The WSJ is being ridiculous, but unfortunately so are far too many of Mamdani's fellow Democrats.

Expand full comment