Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tina D's avatar

Lol this rhetoric is a great way to change the culture. So many folks have a hard time villianizing rich folks because they want to be a rich folk. I get a lot of "don't judge" type comments when I start saying stuff like that but excuse me, I WILL JUDGE. Nepotism: judge. Trust fund: judge. You should judge too. You're one layoff away from selling your house. Be mad at the banks, at the real estate ventures keeping property values inflated. You know the rich people. 🤣

Expand full comment
poloniousmonk's avatar

It's called "Divide and Conquer", and it's as old as colonialism. I think LBJ expressed it best:

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

Two things I like to point out:

1) Somebody calculated that the top 1% has taken $50 trillion from the rest of us since 1980. We could use the government to simply appropriate that back and disburse it among the population. It comes out to about $150k per citizen. $600k for a family of four. This might make a good plank on a platform to run for office, but you'd probably need bulletproof skin to pull it off.

2) Why isn't there a maximum wage tethered to the minimum wage? Cap earnings and tax earned and unearned income the same. Eliminate inheritance. That leaves everyone to balance between two life choices. Either work hard when young and acquire assets, then slow down and live off unearned income when you're old or work hard and play hard all your life.

Humans have known how to create a sustainable and socially just society for over a hundred years. We're just too easily manipulated by our emotions to ever bother doing so.

You can't give a pack animal a mind :)

Expand full comment
74 more comments...

No posts